Critical knowledge health

Are the knowledge dependencies of the workflow fit for use?

Calculation & scope

Registered critical knowledge items with a named owner, approved valid version and in-date review / all registered critical items required by the workflow x 100.

Evidence to prepare

Dependency inventory, ownership register and review records. Report unregistered dependencies and missing high-criticality items separately.

Suggested owner & cadence

Knowledge owner / monthly + material-change review

Useful during

Design; build; operate

Interpretation & action

Prioritize gaps by decision impact. A high aggregate does not compensate for one missing policy essential to a high-impact decision.

Connected Perspective

Enterprise Knowledge Backbone

Define authoritative knowledge and the responsibility for maintaining it.

An RPL operational definition. Agree the population, observation window, baseline, tolerance and accountable owner before adopting it.

Explore all measures Build a scorecard →